|
This web site attempts to describe an overall theory, that takes the form of
what is described as two fundamental forms of human interpretation, which
define what is considered as of Consequence , the understanding of which illustrates the fundamental social distinctions and conflicts inherent in human existence. There is said to exist a duality described by the concepts of the
Conservative and Progressive Paradigms.
A summary is found here.
Schematic
Conservative Spirituality is defined to mean that the natural world possesses an inherent integrity of existence, that is defined as a characteristic of
Spirituality , as opposed to
Religious Materialism . All natural change is considered to promote
the existence of this spiritual state by continuous regeneration, as an already complete and perfect part and whole, in exact or near like form. The natural world is considered the authority for human activity and behavior and is characterized by what is termed
Natural Law . The perspective of human conduct is said to be
Ethical , which emphasizes prohibitions upon alternative human created states, as opposed to volitional alternatives to nature.
Progressive Materialism means that
everything physical is considered to contain no inherent consequence in and of
itself, and thus can be used as material for human created states and the creation of
Excess and Profit . The authority for human activity and behavior
is a dualistic system of consequence, demonstrated by the concept of the
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative , that illustrates the criterion for the validity of the existence of any entity, and the way all consequence is assessed. This is determined by the degree to which any given entity corresponds to models of development and perfection. In terms of human conduct, Progressive Materialism emphasizes
Morality , which promotes human volition as opposed to prohibitions. Futher overview is found in the dissertations
, Synopsis and
Consequence .
The ideas contained in this work are for the most part original to the author and thus no sources are cited. They are meant to stand upon the authority of their own internal logic and do not depend on outside credentials or personification for their legitimacy. This work is in a continuous state of editing and addition. The conclusions contained herein are the result of analysis based upon what the logic has produced and are not necessarily the predilections of the author.
Web site address:
www.lexloci.info
12/00/97
|
