Metaphysics

Secret Knowledge

The question has always been secret knowledge. Occult groups selling secret knowledge. Is secret knowledge legitimate and necessary, or is it a cult come-on? The feeling around here has been the latter. Specified knowledge should be secret because many people would not be able to comprehend the information without serious mental breakdown. Or specific knowledge should be kept secret because evil people would use it for evil purposes. Secret knowledge might involve the astral plane, and powers greater than found in the material world. But the real question would be, are there evil spirits to which stupid people should be prevented from using, in conjunction with stupid spirits?

Progressive

Is the spirit world progressive? With consciousness greater for some and less for others? Most spiritual and religious systems are progressive. The reason and meaning of activity and behavior is progressive advancement toward the Metaphysical Ideal, as superior perfection. Not a big believer in the Progressive system. Buddhism, it is believed, is a system of the Conservative Existent Determination, meaning change as promoting or encouraging the preservation of pre-existent states changed, in a same or similar state and condition. However, the problem it would seem, is that progressivism is necessary to get to that realization. Or could it be that the Meta State is both Conservative and Progressive.

I Ching

If it is assumed that there be a meta plane plan, the purpose of which activation, involves Spontaneous Biological Generation, as well as incarnated world astral helpers, capable of temporal intercession as communication with the material being, how is this intercession interpreted? If one gets such as a job offer, does it correspond to the meta plane plan? How does one determine this? A means to this end is called the I Ching, a Chinese book of fortune-telling or a divination manual. Ask a question from earth and get an answer from heaven, by throwing three coins six times, and adding up the heads (2) and tails (3), which will equate to one of sixty-four hexagrams, which theoretically answers one's question, with perhaps some subjective interpretation. Can one throw the same hexagram three times in a row, refusing to accept the result. This author has done it, giving it some credibility. Or one can use the traditional method of fifty Yarrow sticks, or stalks from the Yarrow plant.

Metaphysics (50 of x) Next Page