Heaven
Is heaven Socialist or Capitalist? We are led to believe that there is no need in heaven. Nothing is needed. That would eliminate Capitalism, which primarily produces wants, but also needs, when it can steal need production from Government, which generally provides needs. So that would also eliminate Socialism, where there would be no heavenly need. Would there be wants? Is a harp all that is needed or wanted? Who makes and tunes the harps? Are they unionized? Is one not needed? I suppose the rationale is, that God made heaven and everything in it. End of story and solves all problems. God answers all questions, and one doesn't need to know anything. Isness.
Species
One could measure eternity or good enough, by species, as types of organisms, some of which have existed for as much as millions of years, like the "nautilus (500 million years old), jellyfish (550 million years old), and sponge (760 million years old," which reproduce themselves endlessly, which is how they are everness. What is short-lived, is the individual, living a single lifetime. You want eternal life, maybe you have to be a species, but how to be all, as all the ones? If spirits or souls are eternal, are they like species, or how that, be all and one, at the same time? Are souls similar to species as archetypes, of singular say spirits. Would Souls through spirits, reproduce themselves evernessly?
Cognizance
Does the universe exist if there is no cognizance of it? Well, my thinking on it always was, the universe would or could exist, but no one would know it. Does heaven exist if no one knows it? Heaven would or could exist, and wouldn't necessarily need for me of any, to be cognizant of it. In fact the cognizance of it, would more or less negate cognizant earth existence. Oh, I'm not from here, just traveling though, a planetary tourist you might say. No - I could never know what the locals know. I'm not from here, I didn't no. To what degree would one have free will? And would free will be the whole point of cognizance?
Double aM
Me or whoever, comes up with this stuff? I'm not sure I am that smart. Sort of think of it as a partnership, the W. The double aM. And actually I don't do this stuff for planetary beings. No one seems smart enough to understand it. So I do it for my myself and double me. But then for who does my double me, pronouns do it for? I think of my meta embodiment as a woman. But I once saw an image of a man. Well I prefer a woman but what choice do I have ? A girl friend. A kind of Greek Athena. The pronoun proceeds me. Its a partnership, or who knows, maybe it would be a team, if it's anything at all.
Metaphysics (65 of x) Next Page