Dissertations
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
The Hierarchical Arrangement as described here, represents an archetypal system. However the conception of the Antipodal Associative Paradigm is most always unconscious and varies from person to person, which is termed the transitive reference, meaning different people have different conceptions, of the class system, depending upon the class they are a part. The lower classes know almost nothing about the upper classes.
The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is derived from the polarization
of Consequential Value, which is inherent to the creation or adoption of Progressive Materialism. The value and Consequence of everything is material, having no inherent Consequence in and of itself, except as material resource for the creation of material anomaly as
Progression. The human sensory system, naturally distinguishes between degrees of opposing attributes, like something between sweet and sour, hard and soft or hot
and cold.
Amorphous Sensations are, wherein no association from the memory, as specifically Consequential Value, affects or animates the sensory experience or response, or becomes associated with opposing values, such as feelings of love associated with capitalism, and feelings of hate with socialism, or angels with clouds, and perfect bliss associated with heaven, fire and brimstone associated with hell, or apple pie associated with the home-land and patriotism, while dinner of dog may be assumed the fare of certain foreign lands, the emotional response system reflects, the polarity and scale of value, which is illustrated by the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative.
Antipodal Associative Paradigm (2 of 12)
Next Page
