Authoritarianism

Charity is a dynamic and function of the concept of Morality. Morality as opposed to Ethics, means the absence of absolute prohibitions, wherein anything is allowed relative to situation and circumstance. For instance murder may be allowed in war but not in civilian life. Almost anything goes on private property but not on public. The rich can afford bail and topnotch lawyers while maybe the poor cannot. The elite get special access to every kind of public function while the ordinary do not, and on and on. How things and people are treated is the measure of Consequence, which is established again by the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. The absence of absolute prohibitions allows for greater volitional abilities, as the ability to exploit natural and human resources, for the purpose of material acquisition, which gives meaning and identity substantiation. Morality is defined here as the means of controlling and mitigating the damage, that is done by the absence or limitation of prohibitions. Prohibitions as they exist are conditional based upon the assessed consequence of the given subject.

Moral conduct is the mitigation of greater volitional capacities. Charity in keeping with the tradition of Morality, allows progressives to exploit both natural and human resources, and to accumulate unlimited material assets to the detriment of the environment and the exclusion of others, while giving to themselves good feeling, while they have so much more than others. Thus charity is the means by which the elite can hold select functions, wherein only the privileged and wealthy can afford to attend, and at the same time raise money, for the charity of those who could never afford functions such as these.

Authoritarianism (49 of 52) Next Page