Antithetical Opposition
is the human Interpretation of natural change, as
opposed, oppositional and antithetical to human
created progressed states and conditions, and which
allows for the unfettered use of the natural world,
to include humankind, as material for the creation
of so-called superior Qualified States, by the absence
of prohibitions upon the treatment of any given state
or entity, excepting that derived from things like the
authority of God, Morality or private property.
Antithetical Opposition takes the form of the bipolar,
or a duality of value and Consequence. Some change is
good and some is bad, relative to the results and products
which are produced. And of course, change should
correspond to the interests and ambitions of human
purpose. Since change is inherent to the Given Existence,
if it is interpreted as Antithetical, then by deduction, nature
itself can be defined as opposed to human values.
Authority Reasoning
means that facts, evidence and premises,
are selected and disregarded based upon
correspondence to already pre-existent authority,
or authoritative objectives in future. Information
which does not support that authority is disregarded.
Objectives as ends dictate evidence, and any evidence
to the contrary is denied. A one in a thousand year
flood, is not evidence of global warming.
Authority Reasoning means that the conclusions
of reasoning generally conform to Authoritative
Imperatives. These imperatives are pre-existent
conclusions that take the form of principles, standard,
ideals, values, rule, law or propositions. Authority
Reasoning means that facts, evidence and premises,
are selected and disregarded based upon prejudice
toward conclusions already reached or held. Thus,
this form of reasoning is considered as Deductive
Logic, wherein reasoning proceeds from the general
to the particular, or from the principle to the evidence.
Authority Reasoning is the logic of the superior Part,
and Metaphysical Ideal, God and Excess and Profit,
which by their ascendancy dictates that evidence
must conform or be discarded.
Progressive Evaluative System
is called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative,
and is the basis of Morality, which derives from
polarization of Consequence, as material resource
and Excess and Profit. The Dyadic Authoritative
Comparative is Numerical Evaluation, as incremental
degrees between Antithetical Opposites, negative and
positive, or as zero to ten. Evaluation from zero is the
said irredeemable individual, and from one the
redeemable.
Numerical Evaluation describes degrees of
worth and consequence, between the Comparative
Bases, in which Existence Ethos considered as zero,
and the Metaphysical Ideal as ten. The lower numbers
from zero to five, equate to the Antithetical Matrix, as
poor, uneducated, low and lower middle class, old,
dilapidated, Socialism, primitive, evil and unrefined.
The higher numbers from five to ten equate to the
Metaphysical Ideal as rich, powerful, ideal, high class,
educated, sophisticated, new, expensive, first-rate,
refined and perfection. The middle numbers five and
six are the middle class, seven and eight upper middle
class and nine and ten upper class. All economic
evaluation by money is for the most part one to ten,
one to one hundred, one to one thousand and so on.
Morality
Because of the Consequential Negation of Progressive Materialism, which deems the entire natural world as without any inherent Consequence, except for Religion and Perfection, a social governance must be created called Morality, which is in actuality and numerical evaluative system called here the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, of the Progressive Paradigm. This is a system of evaluation, which uses a scale of Numerical Evaluation, as incremental degrees between Antithetical Opposites, negative and positive, or as one to ten. Evaluations, as degrees of Consequence, worth or validity, for any state or entity, are assessed by degree on the scale of one to ten, added from one and subtracted from ten, like earthly existence might be something more than hell and something less than heaven. How any given entities are treated, is according to place on the scale. Polytheistic Indian holy sites are low on the scale and may be exploited. Monotheistic holy sites, like churches, are high and sacrosanct. God is ten and the devil is zero. The lower class are lower numbers and the higher classes are higher numbers.Not so much racism as the classism of the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative.
Emotion
is defined as physical reaction or response, of the
Human Sensory Apparatus to sensual stimulation,
as present experience or thinking, wherein the
response is affected by and relative to Associations,
which contains Consequential Value significant to the
individual. The individual is much distressed at the
death of one's own dog, but not of other people's
animals.
What and how Consequential Value is defined,
affects and determines the sensory response.
Consequential Value as Association, may be
defined in terms of either Correspondent of
Disconjunctive Association. By Correspondent
Association, the sighting of a snake may provoke
associations of only what the individual has had
personal experience with in terms of snakes. This
may be the experiences of many Garter anf
Gopher snakes. The snake may have no
particular consequence for the individual, other
than possibly a sensory appreciation, and thus
the response is Natural Affection.
By Disconjunctive Association, the sighting of
a Snake may provoke associations as anything
from the assumption that it is poisonous and
will bite one, wherein visions may occur of
cutting an X upon the wound, and various
scenarios of slow and traumatic death, to evil
visions of the fall of man in the Garden of Eden,
and that all snakes are evil. In this case the snake
has strong consequences attached to it and thus
the emotional response can be quite animated.
Because the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative
is the evaluative system of Progressive Materialism,
Emotion as associative Consequence, is determined by
numerical scale. At the top of the scale ten, would be
the elite, gentility, gentry, nobility, noblesse or
patricians of the greatest Consequence. The top of the
scale would garner the greatest emotional consideration
and empathy. At the bottom zero and one, would be the
poor, uneducated, unconnected, crass and deplorables,
as the least Consequence, and would engender the least
emotional sympathy and rapport. Love and hate.