Links
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
REASONING
would mean the reason or reasons, as why, what, which, where or when,
concerning anything being, and anything that effects such being in anyway. Two types or reasoning are described here, as Foundation Reasoning which would be accordant to the Conservative Paradigm, and Authority Reasoning, as would be correspondent to the Progressive Paradigm.
Foundation Reasoning
means that conclusions are derived from grounds, foundation, facts, evidence and premises as given and collected, to which the conclusion should be derived regardless of the personal predilections of the reasoner. Evidence dictates ends. The Ego as interpreter, operator and protector of the body, must rely on accurate, dependable, true and predictable information, evidence and Association, to maintain and sustain safe body well-being. Thus, Foundation Reasoning would be the logic of the Ego, and would be the logical processes affinitive to the Whole, as best practices for all its Parts.
Authority Reasoning
means that facts, evidence and premises are selected and disregarded based upon correspondence to already pre-existent authority or authoritative objectives in future, and which is the propensity of the Identities, and where objectives as ends dictate evidence. The future is determined by objectives. Information which does not support that authority is disregarded. Any evidence to the contrary is denied. In reference to the subject matter Identity, the authority for reasoning would be said to be the Identity, in which reason should support its validity. When one makes a living by selling dangerous products unknown to the buyer, the Identity of the seller will more often than not self-deny the truth of culpability, wherein the authority for reasoning is the Identity of good-seller Sam.
Any Age Authority (19 of 40)
Next Page
