Dissertations
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
From the finite determinations of Conservative and Progressive change, can be said to derive two fundamental forms of Consciousness, perspective, psychology and
Interpretive Context, by which any given individual, in any age or time will tend to act, behave and conduct themselves, based upon the interpretation of what is of Consequence and what is not. These are termed the
Conservative Spiritual Ethical and
Progressive Material Volitional Identities. These two philosophies are diametrically opposed, in opposition to each other, and thus each must be looked at separately.
Conservative Spirituality defines the opposition of natural change as Complimentary. Its fundamental premise in terms of Consequence, is that if the Given Existence were used as authority for all human activity and behavior, and all natural change recreates itself in exact or near like form, then in terms of Finite Determination, it is an already existent and complete result and product, that explains itself in human terms by the experience of its condition and the
existence of all things. An authority for this condition as a Conservative dynamic, is explained by the concept of
Orbital Correlation. All life must correspond to the conditions created by the earth's orbit around the sun, and anything that evolves or progresses out of this correlation is doomed to extinction. So long
as the exterior environment remains stable, life dependent upon that environment must recreate itself in like form, to remain in harmony with the ecological condition. Change must be Conservative. (Subtopic:
Symbolic Consciousness.)
Progressive Materialism defines the opposition of natural change as
antithetical to human values and ideals. Natural change is also said to produce no result and product that explains its existence, and thus for both reasons the natural world and universe, to include humankind, is defined as possessing no
Consequential Integrity in and of itself.
CONSEQUENCE (3 OF 10)
NEXT PAGE
