Consequence

The upshot of the Consequential Negation of Progressive Materialism is volition and volitional capacities. Without inherent Consequential Integrity everything becomes eligible for use and exploitation in the drive for progressive development.

As nothing is safe and sacrosanct, the means by which protection, primarily for humans is achieved, is the system of conduct described here as what is commonly known as Morality, wherein the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is used as a means of evaluation. Because varying cultures, social institutions or religions have varying Metaphysical Ideals or Extra Mundane Authorities and accordant opposites, the specific values vary, while the archetypal Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is universal to the progressive system. Individuals, mineral and vegetable entities are treated relative to their place on the scale of the dyadic authoritative. Those or that which most closely corresponds to progressed ideals, enjoy the greatest respect, advantages, favortism, sanctity, desirability or status, such as a church, millionaire, movie star, surgeon or big-time museums. Those or that least in correspondence, gets the least respect or protection, is subject to prejudice or use and exploitation like beggars, waste land, primitives, lower classes or undeveloped land. The essence of Morality is that absolute prohibitions are not inherent in the system of Progressive Materialism and thus Consequence is determined by comparison using the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative as a guide. (Subtopics: Historical Morality and Humanism)

The emphasis of Conservative Spirituality tends to be Prohibitive. Because every element of the natural world enjoys a Consequential Integrity in which there is a general attitude of respect and reverence, activity, behavior and conduct is governed by what is termed Ethics. As a generality, any given natural pre-existent state is considered of greater consequence than alternatives that can be created to replace it.

CONSEQUENCE (8 OF 10) NEXT PAGE