Links
Determination:
Determination represents
the Interpretation and
Evaluation of the Consequence of the Condition, state or entity, as definition,
which would indicate what it is, how it should be treated, what or what not it can
be used for, and whether or not it can be transformed or destroyed. By definition the good must be preserved and the bad destroyed, where these qualities are interpretations and evaluations. [sp]
Absent Determinant:
The Absent Determinant is the absence of any known comparative physical reality, or any provable non-physical reality, equivalent to the earth's planetary living Condition as
Comparative Standards, in which to compare, qualities, conditions and dynamics by degrees of similarity or distinction, that would indicate the reason, purpose, motive, meaning and Consequence of Being, of any or all elements of the natural world. The best way to study one civilization
is to study many civilizations through the auspices of the study of history. This absence of comparative determinatives essentially means anyone is free to believe anything, as free-for-all or complete free-will.
Change:
Since there is only one known planetary Condition containing life, the means of Determination can only be by distinctions of change, as pre-existent Condition compared to changed Condition, or whether a changed Condition is better or worse than the Condition previous. The Internet is better than no Internet or vice versa. This is a present Condition compared to the memory of a previous Condition. Change is defined as results and products produced as changed conditions, both internal or external to any given Delineated Entity. The Consequence of any given Delineated Entity is determined by the results and products it produces both internal and external to itself as change. Good health may be the result of ingesting good food, but problems with health were a result of too much carousing. [sp]
Whole/Part:
Fundamental to the dynamics of the definition of change is said to be the concepts of the Part as an individual Delineated Entity, and the Whole
as a collection of Parts, both of which are the genisis and monitors of change.
Every Whole is a Part and every Part is a Whole described as circumscribed domain, composed of numerically limited multiplicity of elements or Parts,
which comprise a Unified Function in conjunction with each other. Every member of the chorus is
to sing in harmony with each other. The difference between the Whole and the Part is said to be that the Part produces change as products external to itself. The farmer grows bean and is called a bean farmer. The Whole is said to produce products internal to itself. The farmer's market is a collection of individual farmers selling their produce. [sp]
Change as evaluated from the internality of the Whole is said to be called
Constant, which is change as the continuous preservation and duplication of Condition in near exact likeness,
and thus the
Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Constant. The tree
conforms to the forest. Change as evaluated from the externality of the
Part is Constant when conforming to the Whole, and is called Random when it is some degree of derivation from Constant and thus the Comparative Base for evaluation is what is Random or the exception. The standard of comparison is what is unusual and exceptional. [sp]
Paradigms:
From the concepts of the Whole and the Part are said to derive the Conservative and
Progressive Paradigms, as the the fundamental ruling Philosophys and Psychologys, of human
consciousness and culture, to which all organized society conforms and
functions, as Progressive
development and
Conservative natural continuity. [sp]
Progressive Paradigm:
The Progressive Paradigm is based on the concept of Finite Determination,
which coincides with the dynamics of the Part. The results and products as altered states of any given entity defines and explains the activity and behavior of change, as external and by function: the reason, purpose and Consequence of the entity producing the change. The product produced by the hydroelectric plant explains its existence and Consequence. Thus everything is interpreted and evaluated by what it does and produces and what is possessed as a result.
Social class is primarily determined by what people produce and have as a result.
[sp]
Comparative Polarities:
The concept of Finite Determination, wherein valid Consequence is determined by products produced external as progressive development, creates a
Context of antithetical Comparative Polarities.
Entities which do not produce progressive development are considered to
possess no Consequence because they produce no products deemed to be of worth, and of which consequential change as distinct and better can be assessed. Indigenous people who do not engage in excess and profit are generally defined as of little worth. Antithetical Consequence also solves the problem of the necessity of resource, which ascribes what is needed as no matter. [sp]
Choate Whole:
The root of Comparative Polarities is said to descend from the concept of the
Choate Whole, which is defined as producing no consequential results and products external, and thus its Consequence cannot be explained by comparison to what it produces external to itself. The planet earth is called a Choate Whole, producing no discernable products external to itself which explains its existence. Thus by the definition
of Finite Determination, it would have no Consequence in and ot itself called
Consequential Negation. [sp]
Since there is no external product to explain the existence of a Choate Whole,
the explanation must come from within, wherein the Whole is explained by the Part. A specific Part within a Whole, by the products it produces external to itself, as superior, exceptional, refined, premium and meritorious, explains the Whole as Unified Function, the purpose of which is to support the distinct product produced by that specific Part. The purpose of the universe is to create and support the crown of creation, the human being as exceptional from all other
known beings. This is superior elite development and refinement as exhibited especially by the aristocracies of monarchy, for which the commoners as the Whole, are to admire, emulate, respect and serve. [sp]
Conservative Paradigm:
The Conservative Paradigm is based on the concept of Existent Determination,
which coincides with the dynamics of the Whole, as a collection of Parts that create results and products internal to itself. The collection of Parts of a living body in unison produces the internal construct a living organism. All Parts in a Whole are equal to the existence of the Whole as a Delineated Entity, and thus are each equally necessary. Products internal mean change which essentially duplicates and preserves the existing structure as a collection necessary to the continuance of the Whole. Individuality weakens the existing structure by failing to perform its part as integral to the entire structure. Change proceeding from within is called duplication. Team sports are based upon specified rules which cannot be changed willy-nilly without changing the essence of the game. [sp]
The definition of Conservative would be said to mean the Whole explains the Part. The Whole explains the Part as a collection of affinitive entities, which act in Unified Function to comprise the internal domain of a Delineated Entity, which may be a Choate Whole in and of itself, or may as producing products external to itself in service of a greater Whole be also a Part. Any organic body explains the existence and function of all its component Parts, such as heart and lungs. The earth as a Choate Whole might be explained as every Part of which it is composed, is the infinite existence of a material and living organism producing
at least Cognizance. [sp]
Psychology:
The Psychological aspect of the Whole and the Part is introduced primarily through group dynamics, as the individual representing the Part, and group encounters representing the Whole, and which become subconscious aspects
of a person's psychology. [sp]
Psychology represents the concept of
Context, as the Interpretation and Evaluation of Consequence through memory and mind of Condition as the physical world. Interpretation and Evaluation are said to be the province of three interpretive agencies,
called Ego, Identities and Ipseities. [sp]
The Ego is said to be the interpreter and evaluator of Condition, as the selector of Association specifically confined and relevant to the body, both internal and external. The interpretive function of the Ego as specific to the body, is likened to the Whole as a Delineated Entity, complete in itself as conforming to its environment. [sp]
The Identities are constructs of the mind which act as elucidations of Context
through the auspices of Interpretive Context
and
Interpretive Personifications created for the purpose of accomplishing objectives in the external world. Identities are likened to the Part as constructed to produce primarily products external to themselves. [sp]
Ego:
The Ego is called the selector of Association, as interpreter and evaluator of all sensory appreciation, pertaining specifically to the Consequence as what affects the body, either by direct experience or as Association pertaining to bodily experience both external and internal.
The body, as an existing constitution and Constant, is the determinate for Consequence,
where its internal function as a Constant
is paramount. [sp]
Internal Authority:
The Selector of Association as the Ego parallels the dynamics of the Whole, wherein Determination of Consequence would be primarily the body called Internal Authority, meaning
an internal interpreter and evaluator, where the mandates for the selection of Association applied to any given subject, in reality or mind, would be associated from the context internal to the self, self-experience and self-determination of the Ego as the monitor of the body. [sp]
Optimum Correspondence:
Determinations of the Ego are said to primarily be made utilizing the Evaluative System called Optimum Correspondence.
The body is called Constant, which means the parameters of its constitution are fairly
defined, definitive, stable and fixed, while the external domain of which it exists is called
Random, meaning unpredictably changeable to which the body must be adjusted in conformance. [sp]
Conservative:
The Ego as the associational selector of the manifestations of the body, by necessity
correlates to the function of the body as a Whole, as to preserve the workings of all its internal Parts, and as such is called
Conservative, and wherein the Parts work as a Unified Function to promote the
existence of the Whole. [sp]
Controversal:
The body is both a Whole and a Part called a Controversal, which means every or any given element is a Whole in and of itself having Parts contained within, and any given Whole is a Part in and of itself, as a single element contained within a larger Whole. The body is a Whole in and of itself, and at the same a Part of a larger surrounding environment as a greater Whole. The body is a Whole in and of itself and as such is Conservative, meaning the Ego must conform the internal body as a Constant, to proper maintenance such that it maintains
its integrity of composition. A primary aspect of the body as a Part, is the concept of the Identities, the purpose of which is to produce artifacts external to the self. [sp]
Identities:
In contrast to the Ego as a singular interpretive context representing one body, are what
are called Identities, which represent the possible creation of multiple personalities and characterizations as externalities to the Ego, the object of which, as with the function of the
Part, is to produce and perform tasks and objectives primarily in the external world, but
also as alternative mind-scapes. [sp]
External Authority:
The Identities are called external interpreters and evaluators which means conceptions in the mind that act as models for thinking and activity and behavior, to which the mind and body are educated and instructed to correspond. They are called external because they represent
methods and techniques for the production and actualization products, and where these
activities become identified with the definition of who the person is. They also called
external because the sources and instructions for such Identities called External Authority, as meaning contexts of interpretation independent of the Ego, as Associational context based on information and knowledge obtained vicarious to the actual experience of the body and Ego, through word of mouth, books, education, media, or any manner not of actual self-experience. External Authorities are the acceptance of dictates for thinking, activity and behavior from sources other than oneself and one's self-experience. The determination of Consequence relies on external vicarious sources. [sp]
Progressive:
Identities can be Conservative or Progressive as parallel the dynamics of the Whole or the Part. Identities are creations of the mind and do not necessarily have to be representative of
reality in any way whatsoever, and thus they can correspond and be affinitive to existing external conditions, or they can be representative of any sort of created reality possible.
When Conservative Identities can be thought of as corresponding to the dynamics of the Whole which can be called by the general term
Socialist, wherein products produced are primarily maintenance as preserving existing conditions internal to the social, cultural and community milieu in a same or similar manner. Newly created communities would conform to environs for the community as a Whole and not the privatization of individuals. [sp]
Progressive Identities can be called
Individualist as conforming to the dynamics of the Part. The Part is called Progressive when it produces products external to itself, which alters the state in which the Part exists, so as to better correspond the Whole to itself. Principles of individualism would represent the Part as independent of the Whole, and especially where the Part represent an elite .....
to which the Whole is to support. [sp]
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative:
The Selector of Association as the Identities parallels the dynamics of the Part, wherein Determination of Consequence would be primarily concerned with accomplishment of tasks and goals as producing necessities and superfluities external to itself. A bipolar Evaluative System results from the dichotomy of products produced by the Part, and the resources necessary as materials for production as acquired from the Whole. Resource from the Whole as material is given negative value meaning that it can be exploited, and products produced are given positive assessment as creating meaningful progression. [sp]
Negative Comparative Base
as resource taken from the Whole are given little or no Consequence called Additory Base to which Consequence is assessed as more than by comparison. Positive Comparative Base as maximum Consequence, is called
Subtractive Base to which Consequence is assessed by comparison as less than. [sp]
Ipseities:
The term Ipseity represents the selector of Association, as conceptually created interpreters and evaluators of what is considered to be other-dimensional context and personification, as bespeaks spiritual and religious conceptions and ideals. These conceptions can be represented as the disposition to External or Internal Authority. [sp]
Religious Ipseities are defined as icons, image and word, as mandates for thought and behavior based on the External Authority, where the sources of conception are external
to the individual as organized religious instruction and education of others. These conceptions are generally based on conceptions where the natural world is rejected as a Choate Whole and a conceptual replacement is necessary. God represents the Whole of which the individual is a Part and should conform to the larger domain. [sp]
