Links
1
2
3
Egalitarian:
Matriarchy would be Egalitarian, again following on the pattern of the Whole, wherein every Part would be equal to every other, by virtue of the equivalent necessity of each to the Whole. And where the Ego and body are the same in most respects other than size and sex, most of the fundamental differences in people are said to derive from mind and Identities.
Socialist:
The Whole is said to be
socialist and
template for Socialism, and thus would be matriarchal
in its confluence. Socialism is
Government,
much maligned by the
capitalists, and Capitalism is equivalent to Patriarchy.
Socialism as government is the pooling of resources collectively owned by all the citizens, held in trust and managed by government for the benefit of all and everyone.
Government is the providing of services for the all, in which individuals could not afford or facilitate by themselves.
However everyone does not work for the government as there is not enough jobs, and thus there is Capitalism where everyone works for themselves as Monoculture. Socialism would be Matriarchal in its constituent makeup.
Democratic:
Matriarchy would be democratic if social and political systems were Egalitarian, for how else could it be. Thus
selection is first-come first-serve or by lottery and majority rules. But is everyone equal, some people being better at this, and others being better at that. As a matter of skill sets people are not equal, and thus economic pay scales are tiered as is the pricing of commodities. When ends are predominate, means are ranked, tiered and stratified such as to best produce desired results. When means are predominate ends are or can be egalitarian, as what's important here is we didn't win but everybody played.
If Matriarchy doesn't exist except in the home, then it could culturally and politically, depending on-how it would-be defined.
Matriarchy (3 of 3)
Index Page
