Lexloci
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Love as Natural Affection or sensory response is natural and direct affects, wherein Association is limited to identification and context and of Consequence only when
imperative impending. Love of the rainbow light misted from falling water. Love is watching birds fly or people walk.
Consequence as a rule determines what the individual will be aware. If everything is of Consequence then the individual will be observant of everything. This could also be called the love of everything. Otherwise the individual is observant of only what is important to the self. And with a bipolar evaluative system such as the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, love is reserved for the
Metaphysical Ideals and hatred is introduced as oppositional, associated with every negative sensory
experience. So if one loves heaven one hates its opposite as a requirement. Materialist love is conditional.
Of Natural Affection one does not grade Consequence such that awareness is constricted to approved criterion.
However this rule may not apply to fascism and fascists, or those who would affect one's life negatively for self-gain positive. Natural predation of necessity is without malice.
Everything or All may be considered of equal Consequence,
if everything is necessary to the working of the Whole.
Unconditional love is an equality of evaluation or an acceptance of whatever a thing is as what it is without qualification.
Is love Consequence of Being ? Both love and hate can be.
To love and have someone love-one may be all that matters, if feeling is considered as a or the Consequence of Being. And hatred can be reason to exist, as the desired destruction considered a good thing, of the objects of one's enmity. One may live for hatred and it could serve as one's Identity, an objective to destroy what one despises. Thus Emotion can serve as Consequence of Being.
Consequence of Being (12 of 20)
Next Page
