Lexloci
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
The Consequence of Being of the individual entity then would be equivalent to the Whole, or if the planet was considered a Whole, the individual Part would be equal in value to the Consequence of the planet. To deny the planet has any Consequence as do the Christians, is to say they have no value which is what they say. Only God can grant them legitimate Consequence.
The evaluative system of the Conservative is called
Optimum Correspondence and can be associated with
government in general and
Socialism in particular. Optimum Correspondence uses a single
Comparative Authority, as the optimum condition of any given entity. Evaluation is optimum or can be something more, but is usually something less requiring correction and maintenance. Of course things can be too cold or too hot and more than optimum. The optimum external temperature for the human it is said, is seventy-two degrees.
All life requires optimum conditions, which is what Consequence is. Life is maintaining Optimum Correspondences which determines the consequences of everyday being. As Goldilocks discovered, the third bowl of porridge was not too hot and not too cold but just right.
Thus the Consequence of Being would mean, being of what Consequence ? Not too this and not too that but just right,
might describe the general state affairs, but does not answer the question of what is one ultimately worth. Personally I am worth twelve dollars.
One would think Optimum Correspondence with a single Comparative Authority, would be the evaluative system of Monotheism rather than Polytheism. There would be optimum as the perfection of God, but nothing more since God is the ultimate, leaving only that which is less as second-rate people in need progressive fixation, the dictator and his dominion.
Consequence of Being (5 of 20
Next Page
