Commentaries
1
2
3
4
5
6
A new type of organism may simply appear. The host for the appearance may be a closely related species, of which a limited number may be born in the beginning. There may be built in mechanisms for inbreeding without damage to the original offspring. There may also be some correlation as a type of spiritual factor which produces this occurrence based upon the needs of the environment as a whole, such as when a species is necessary
to perform some function such as specific bugs to encourage the creation of compost.
However when a posit such as the theory of evolution is accepted as law, without allowance for doubt or question, any evidence which appears that may indicate other theories is ignored, and there is no active pursuit of alternatives which there may be evidence for, if it was utilized. The prevailing theory is self-perpetuating.
The theory of evolution on its face seems perfectly valid and most educated people believe it and are astounded that there are those that don't. It seems to make perfect sense and provides a context for the history of life in which everything is explained. A limited evolutionary spectrum would seem to be an acceptable case, within families of species such as the difference between squirrels and bears; the distinctions occurring by environmental differences
as available diet and weather over long periods of time. Some little evidence of this exists by the increasing size of humans related to diet.
However the fundamental factor in respect to the subject of progressive evolution is the planetary environment in terms of its stability. Every organism must correspond in its biological construction to its environment. Any change occurring in the environment, such as temperature which exceeds the capacities of those constructions to remain viable, will cause the destruction
of the species.
EVOLUTION (5 of 6)
NEXT PAGE
