PreludeNew

Interpretation :

Interpretation is the selection of specific memories called Association Association, from the multitudinous store of impressions and images in the memory, which are affiliated, attached, related or associated to specific sensory registration or thinking in the immediate present. Associations give recognition, identification, context and implication to present-time sensory registration. From the post card of the Eiffel Tower, one associated or brought to mind memories and images of Paris. Association from which Interpretation proceeds is called Interpretive Context, as the Associative Landscape of the individual, from which reality or thinking is interpreted, as things must be recognized and defined by the context of what the individual has had experience and knows, which is stored in the memory as Association. Hearing of a Tornado in the mid-Atlantic as the context, one associated from past experience, childhood memories of just such a storm.

There are said to be three primary contexts of interpretation, or three types of associative selectors, as the Ego, Identities and Ipseities. Interpretation would proceed through the associative selector called the Ego, defined as a selector of Association, specifically as that association which pertains to and affects the body - both internal and external. The weather might be interpreted as relating to what the body should wear clothing wise, or how it might affect one's sinus condition. A second interpretive context would proceed through the facilities of the Identities, which are Interpretive Personifications, the primary purpose of which is to accomplish objectives, such as a baker, a four seasons fashion designer, a computer technician or pool cleaner. Interpretation would proceed through the facilities of the Ipseities, which are as Identities objective oriented, but wherein the objectives are external to the normal concerns of the Ego and Identities and which may include objectives as other-dimensional and non-material, as Spiritual, Religious and Metaphysical, such as rainmaker, minister, priest or metaphysician. Each individual possesses one Ego selector, and any number of Identities, the average as a half dozen, as well as perhaps one or more lpsieties.

The Whole and the Ego :

The Ego is the first personality as the interpretation of reality, and all of which, the Ego interprets as personal affect or what relates to, effects and is applicable to the body, such as rain, clothes, food, sleep and exercise, wherein the body is a Whole. Everyone is said to experience reality in a fairly similar manner, where the perception is similar and alike. Everyone perceives feelings such as the heat of the sun, the sound of thunder, or the sight of clouds in a fairly similar way. However, Interpretation may result from a myriad of different contexts, depending on the Associations attached by the individual, relative to varied personal experience, as the interpretation of snow would be different for arctic and desert dwellers. One person freaks when a bee comes 'round and another is not bothered at all. Same sensory experience of bee, but the associative reaction is different. Thus, while the sensory experience is the same or similar, there are a wide range of interpretations. Thus, it would be said, the Ego is fairly similar for everyone and all bodies are a Whole, and so there exists a commonality of function and sameness, and an innate ability to relate to all other Egos, as empathy, understanding, consideration, common bond and fellow feeling.

The Whole is affiliated with the Ego, in that the Ego is the interpreter of the body said to be a Whole. The results and products produced by a Whole are said to be primarily internal to itself, and thus the Ego's primary interest is the body as a Whole. The Time Logic of the body would accord to the Past Comparative Purview, so long as the past has been beneficial or at least not hostile, and thus the Ego would be Conservative, and as such meaning further here, most all change, either duplicates or promotes the duplication of itself in same or like form, the most important Product of the Ego is the preservation of the body as itself. The Authority of the Ego would be Accordant, wherein the body is a Unified Function, and the Ego should accord its interpretative facilities to the necessities, requirements, constraints, obligations and imperatives of the body.

The Part and the Identities :

Identities are Interpretive Personifications created for the purpose of accomplishing objectives. Every profession can be an Identity to accomplish goals, such as baker, soldier, secretary or candlestick maker. Identities as personifications of objectives like mechanic, merchant marine, hairdresser or nurse are created by the mind, and thus any number can be created, and any of which can be imaginary. He imagined himself a ladies man, although he had no girlfriends. While the Ego is Conservative and Identities can be as well, Identities by definition are Progressive unless the objectives are purely maintenance.

The Identities are affiliated with the Part. Identities are singular and individual as personifications, to produce objectives, each of which contains its own rules, means and methods of accomplishment, as all requirements necessary to a baker or a banker, or to learn the game of baseball. The Identity is an Interpretive Context in which to interpret reality in the context of specific objectives, such as a farmer may interpret the sky for signs of weather. If the body and Ego are a Whole, the Identities are Parts, as everyone individual having more than one, that average perhaps six, such as vehicle driver, religious Identity, mother or father, professional Identity, hobbyist or cook. Each Part serves the Whole of the individual, who maybe unaware of the differences and distinctions.

The Time Logic of the Identities would accord to the Future Comparative Purview, as objectives are intentions and goals of the future. The Identities are therefore by dynamic and function Progressive, as both maintenance defined as objectives in future and change as distinct for improvement purposes. The authority for the Identities is said to be Dyadic, in that many objectives and therefore Identities can be dangerous if not bordering on fatality, and therein is a fundamental conflict between the Ego and Identities or body and mind. The Identity of a skydiver would definitely be in conflict with the Ego. Or the Part could be said to be in conflict with the Whole, and one or more Identities of the same individual may be inconsiderate or in conflict with the others.

The Product and the Ipseities :

Ipseities are Interpretive Personifications created for the purpose of accomplishing objectives as Products, as are Identities, but which may reject the Products Poly and Mono Culturalism in whole or part, and may engage in the undertaking of a new characterization, and further as other-dimensionals such as Poly, Mono and Meta theisms. The Time Logic of Ipseities would be Present Comparative Purview, and would mean Future Expectation would accord to qualities, conditions and states preferred the same as the Present. Decisions can be made spontaneously, impromptu and in the moment, depending on situation and circumstance. However, the Triadic Authority would apply, as all three purviews may be employed, primarily the Past Comparative Purview, as pertains to the external state of one's physical reality, while the mind would often utilize Future Comparative Purviews internally, considered as Progressive, as the mind continually learning.

Ipseities would often take the form representative of characterization indicative of Polytheism, Monotheism or Metatheism, such as priests, ministers, rabbis buddhist monks or rainmaker and the like. Metatheism would employ the Present Comparative Purview, as what happens in the here and now, namely the possible awareness of the activity and behavior of spirits, as intercession in the material world, for the most-part personal as a state of mind, of which most everything in reality could be considered of some great consequence, as possibility of some facility of spiritual communication. A further practice of Metatheism would be wherein an individual may employ an Ipseity called the watcher, which is an Interpretive Personification, that watches oneself as a study of one's unconscious behaviors and thinking, such as habitual mechanisms and wherein changes to such can be changed.

New Prelude (6 of 17) Next Page