2nd Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Concerning Metaphysical Psychology as the
Ego, which is the associational interpreter of everything that concerns the body, the Ego would be said to proceed from the past and to be more concerned with less than with more. The Ego's main concern is to maintain a healthy body As-Is, and the primary apprehension would be less of what the body needs rather than more of the what the body doesn't need.
Both the secular Identities and the religious Ipseities, as
psychological personifications of objectives such as tailor, baker, soldier or priest, are future oriented as to produce products to be used in future. The tailor makes clothes, the baker makes bread, the soldier guards against and the priest makes souls. Religion and Ipseities of course are about the future afterlife, as of course more. Secularists can be Conservative but the Metaphysical Ideals are all about more.
The Consequential Negation of all things material necessitates
the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative of Progressive Materialism and a code of conduct called
Morality. Since the natural material world is said to possess no inherent worth or Consequence, the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is the means of evaluation, and in terms of human evaluation Morality is the rules of goodness. Morality is the
propriety of Progressive Materialism based on Excess & Profit.
Since there is no inherent Consequence of anything material,
there are no absolute prohibitions. What there is-is the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, as the means to evaluate the Consequence of any given entity.
Moral conduct towards entities is based and relative to the assessment of Consequence, as the scale of value vis-a-vis the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. And thus Morality is goodness to the approved good entities and people and badness to the unapproved bad entities and people. But primarily Morality allows for the unbridled exploitation of whatever is necessary to create more.
MonoCulture (6 of 7)
Next Page
