Commentaries
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Authoritative Dictates
Authoritative Dictates are ideals and models for human social conditions from which Accords and Social Contracts for societies are based, and which represent superior attributes to which by their superiority, all individuals are subject to the contracts and are expected to conform and correspond. College educated middle class will conform to specific conventions as conforms to that class.
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative
Because the Progressive Paradigm is materialist, negating the consequential integrity of the natural world with no definitive indisputable ethics, a system of evaluation is necessary to preserve some form of human law and order. Correspondent to the Exemplary Schematic, is utilized a numerical evaluative disposition called the
Dyadic Authoritative Comparative, which uses a scale of
Numerical Evaluation as incremental degrees between antithetical opposites negative and positive, or as one to ten. As one analogy might have it, one represents earth and ten represents heaven. The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is an unconscious mechanism and corresponds quite well or exactly, with the economic numerical system one to ten of Capitalism.
Everything is priced between one and ten, with the addition of zeros, as $.07 seven cents, $9.99 is nine, $768.00 is seven or $4,437.00 is four.
Morality
Due to the Absence of Consequence as materialism, Morality is established,
which possesses no inherent prohibitions, but rather the treatment of any given entity is elicited by the evaluative means of the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative. Morality is the prohibitive vehicle of Progressive Materialism in terms of human relations, in which the the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is the vehicle in which value and consequence are assessed, and which determines how states, conditions, entities and individuals can be treated.
Monotheism (3 of 7)
Next Page
