Dissertations

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Ipseities


Ipseities are Identities as Context for objectives which may or may not take on Personifications, except that the objectives are other-dimensional in nature as spiritual, religious or mystical. Ipseity Interpretation would incorporate the Interpretation of symbolism and Semiotic Language the objectives to communicate with Spirit and to learn to live a life engendered of after-life values.

Evaluation:


The assessment of significance and Consequence determines of what the individual is aware and Cognizant, and thus the quality of one's perceived reality. One may especially notice a beautiful car while missing a spectacular sunset. Evaluation means thru processes of Interpretation, that degrees of significance and Consequence are established. Evaluation as the function of the Ego is called Optimum Correspondence. Evaluation corresponded to Identities is called the Dyadic Authoritative Comparative.

A third evaluative system is the province of what is called the Ipseities which are Identities, the difference being that the objectives they are personifications of, are extra or other-dimensional, concerning Spirituality, Religion and what would be called Metaphoria.

The evaluative systems are unconscious. Optimum Correspondence is Conservative which is the nature of the physical body and the the concept Whole. The Dyadic Authoritative Comparative is called Progressive and corresponds to the Identities in the nature of function, and is related to the MetaProperty of the Part. The MetaProperty of Product is related to Comprehension.

Optimum Correspondence:


Optimum Correspondence is the evaluative system of the body and Ego considered as Conservative and a Whole in itself. Optimum means the ideal condition of operation at which any entity functions best.

Cognizant Triad (4 of 10)   Next Page

art